Saturday, November 20, 2021 12:23:35 PM
Your Thesis wrongly assumes that Li/LK is using liquidmetal IP from CIP.
To date there is not one shred of evidence LK is using any IP from CIP.
In fact all the evidence points to liquidmetal 106c, machinery and processes that fall outside of CIP IP and owned by Li.
This is a major breakdown in your argument for Li making millions or billions from the CIP IP.
Li himself declared that the major benefit of owning liquidmetal is the branding, and this has not even kicked into gear yet.
Your going to have to go back to the drawing table in this one padre!!
To date there is not one shred of evidence LK is using any IP from CIP.
In fact all the evidence points to liquidmetal 106c, machinery and processes that fall outside of CIP IP and owned by Li.
This is a major breakdown in your argument for Li making millions or billions from the CIP IP.
Li himself declared that the major benefit of owning liquidmetal is the branding, and this has not even kicked into gear yet.
Your going to have to go back to the drawing table in this one padre!!
Recent LQMT News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/08/2026 08:37:19 PM
- Liquidmetal Technologies Inc. to Present at the LD Micro Main Event XIX • Newsfile • 10/06/2025 11:30:00 AM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/13/2025 08:00:57 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/10/2025 08:02:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/29/2025 08:02:37 PM
