Seems there are a few gaps in this story line like...
*How exactly DOES one come to possess a hijacked ticker anyway? How does such a transfer of ownership and ability to manage it take place?
*Is it not the duty of the individual acquiring a ticker to make sure the person claiming ownership actually has the ownership and authority to hand it off?
*Did the stolen ticker revert back to the original owner who then sold or bartered it to the current CEO? If so, where's the proof of such a transaction and why was that not disclosed in filings?
*How would a "whistleblower" (the T/A as alleged by the current CEO) have anything to do with a hijacked ticker being acquired, transferred or gifted to the current manager?