OK, so I already addressed this issue several times before, however, here is one more try. Our Transfer Agent, to his credit for being very savvy and observant, noticed a pattern of several attempts by the "same" three or four individuals who submitted "Notarized" documents stating that they were replacing "current" C level officers. So, at Signature Transfer, he and his company manages many companies. I believe, that these people got either sloppy or arrogant, because they used the same "Fake" Notary Public people, and the same "formatted" documents. Our TA, on a hunch, and in his case tracking no less than 10 attempts to "highjack" companies the he serviced as a Transfer Agency, decided to call other TA's and compare notes. Very quickly, it became obvious that something was wrong, so he called SEC. In a way, then, HE became a whistle blower! At the end of the investigation, they tracked over 50 companies in various stages of being defrauded by these actors. Our TA services 3 of my companies, SUTI, BDGR and UITA. None of our companies were breached, because our TA WAS the guy who saw the attempt on our and many other companies. Now, I will say, that Miller, one of the bad actors, did fool the Registered Agent in Nevada, who allowed him access to SOS Nevada "corporate back office". However, that's as far as he got, because any corporate actions, and/or significant issuances such as shares issued to themselves, had to go through the TA, (Transfer Agent). So, not only did our TA saved the day and helped the SEC and FBI arrest these idiots, but I also believe that he helped to minimize the overall damage to ALL affected shareholders and their companies. So, as a final statement, UITA was never breached and the mere mention of UITA , I believe, is simply because Signature Transfer was instrumental in catching them.(FOR EXAMPLE: reading the court filings, the charges state many examples of various issuances of shares by these "criminals" to themselves or their affiliates, however, no such examples are presented when UITA was mentioned. Also, there are no changes in our filings showing these characters becoming officers or directors in UITA). However, in any case , we are NOT in any way connected to these "bad actors". No one in our "circles" of people and service providers were involved, so trying to somehow "allege" that just because an attempt to highjack UITA was made , and that somehow that incident makes our company suspect of any wrong doing is simply ridiculous, and on the face value is nothing but "fake news" and an attempt to disparage our good name and is a simple attack on our good character.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
