Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[ignatiusrielly35]

My thought exactly. The value of any math/science theorem—which is essentially what TA proclaims to be—must be judged on whether one can make a prediction that will prove or disprove or disprove the premise. Even if the predicted result only occurs more often than it does not, then it would have value. But without a predicted result, I don’t see what the value is of this TA. So I believe that his technical analysis is interesting but essentially unusable in a practical sense. It’s kind of like predicting that if a coin flip is heads, you will win.