UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[shajandr]

A California state court has little to no effect on this matter. A Cali state court TRO is not enforceable on individuals and corporations ~OUTTside of its jurisdiction (California), and Chanbond and the Chanbond lawyers and lawsuit financiers are not even named as parties to the Cali lawsuit. Nor is any escrow agent (if there even was any!).

The only TRO, if any, would be against Billy and UOIP, and UOIP is not even the recipient of any settlement funds - only Chanbond (and the lawyers and financiers/Billy are). Further, Billy and UOIP can argue, typically at this stage by a general demurrer, that they are each not subject to Cali jurisdiction and that the case ought to be dismissed on that basis - whether or not they file a demurrer and whether or not the Cali court rules in their favor is less important than the Cali court being unable to do anything NOW.

And there is no TRO anyway. This is irrelevant.

And any future judgement by the Cali state court can and likely will simply be ignored, just as Nanotech Entertainment and DAVID RUSSELL FOLEY, USBOP Inmate No. 13141-111 totally ignored the Florida state court orders and judgments in the Longside v. Nanotech series of cases I have linked previously here.

Even DIERDRE has had the good sense to file her most recent claim in Federal District court as a diversity action.

Here ya go: Broward County court of the state of Florida. Miscreants are Nanotech Entertainment and DAVID RUSSELL FOLEY. Three cases that CONsolidated to one. NOTHING was ever collected. NOTHING touched the California resident DAVID RUSSELL FOLEY and the California domiciled Nanotech Entertainment (a Nevada corp). The ONLY court order in those entire three cases (CONsolidated into one) that was actually followed was an order to the TA, who just serendipitously happened to be a Florida company domiciled in Florida - by pure chance.

Read them all - from start to finish. If the links do not work, go to Broward County Court website and search for the cases under Case Search, Business Name, Nanotech.

https://www.browardclerk.org/Web2/CaseSearchECA/Results?TYPE=GetCaseSearchByName_ECA&INPUT=3WmZWMyeZav69YkIqrz%2FdrAKME3uqT53hrdSybijllyawW1sCaQU4drdy8uH1Y0AkM1RCUCvQRReT90mxZi17Jb3yDrTu%2FxqJv3wrR5vsqejqNVSwXg3pR3eo5oa411HAKrxq2x086n1sjuD2WgZQHgkO8MSzffqOUV15kIXBBDt8pyCHQwOtFwHb62qEZ8Drgn7V%2BDDKMJa1J7YOkZ%2Bt6mspZpztk0KUu7hLvdGQdHHHARfLpaeoVVueW1plDBn3gPF6NWDGFH4kiS8Z6ezqVVueW1plDBnw%2BD7CmvA0xS5SFyxhoGlOPaiApiufBlR2PKw17JkDkHJ3qMRBZGh0fu0z0LXHmDv4spvCni8Tkt1r2C8VTgr9ovMGyAHr99a

Read the filings in this case in particular. Feel free to work backwards in time:

https://www.browardclerk.org/Web2/CaseSearchECA/CaseDetail/?caseid=NjQ3NjI1Mw%3d%3d-jil2w9snlis%3d&caseNum=CACE13003103&category=CV&accessLevelCodeOUT=ANONYMOUS&ato=D