1. I can't follow the first two sentences of your post.
2. As to your points 2 and 4, see my response to Bourbon.
3. Frrol was nitpicking a bit, but was not in disagreement with my basic point. He can explain if he agrees with you.
4. As of his last public comments, it is clear to me that Missling has not peeked, has explained why he doesn't need to peek, and has expressed no interest in peeking. You can project your desires on him all you want. (I initially wrote "C'mon" but somehow you are still provoked.)
5. Posters here, including myself, have explained with reference to links or quoted references how an interim look will taint the numbers. You either don't understand the math there or haven't done the research of reading those posts. If the rest of the Investor post you linked to me is too long for you, just read his bolded in red passage.
To sum up, your arguments have relied in whole or in part on misreading, ignoring, or misunderstanding Missling, frrol, Investor, and me.
Market Data 
Markets 
