Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[falconer66a]

It’s not just my defense.

Best defense of our drug I’ve ever heard.

Thanks.

My arguments are pretty standard within the academic community. Every scientific study, and its consequent paper, has to stand up to intense questioning by fellow scholars. Anyone who’s defended a master’s or doctoral thesis knows the game. The candidate does a study, then very carefully tells all that was discovered. Finally, academic advisors, in a formal event, try to disqualify both the paper and the candidate, by asking every sort of question about study and the paper. “Mr. Jones, how could you claim that ... is valid? Aren’t you familiar with Dr. Dorgalson’s work showing exactly opposite of what you claim?”

Contesting verbal, argumentative pokes and jabs about everything in the paper. Get something wrong, or fail to verbally defend it, and start all over.

That’s how science works. Don’t accept anything without actual experimental data that substantiate the validity of new ideas.

My point is this. Yes, I’m a retired high school advanced placement biology teacher, now conducting high-level, world-class ecological studies at a university, which will solve a major ecological problem. At every step, I’ve had to answer the “How can it be....?” questions. That’s what good scientists do. Try to find why some new concept or protocol is invalid. No one is finding any of that with blarcamesine. There are lots of academic and medical science professionals scrutinizing the expanding Anavex story. They, too, can’t find anything wrong with Anavex science. Their silence on the matter is definitive.