News Focus
News Focus
Followers 80
Posts 2304
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/31/2014

Re: longfellow95 post# 389316

Wednesday, 07/14/2021 6:24:56 PM

Wednesday, July 14, 2021 6:24:56 PM

Post# of 823450

And mutated IDH goes with younger age, better prognosis, and a pro-neural signature. But we are only talking about roughly 5% of the GBM population (the 5% that will no longer be called GBM).


Thanks for the great explanation. Could this 5% be correlated with the overall survival stat of roughly 5% for GBM patients alive at 5 years? I'm thinking, 95% of GBM patients never had an effective treatment. If for all of this time, the SOC (surgery, radiation, chemo) only worked on 5% of the GBM patient population (now no longer GBM LOL), then the narrative for a successful DCVAX-L is very different. DCVAX-L would be a first ever effective SOC treatment, period, not a replacement SOC.

Also, if the reason the current SOC works on the 5% only is because IDH mutant makes cancer cells more susceptible to chemo and not the case for the 95% (mesenchymal, primarily IDH wild type), then maybe the we can do away with chemo altogether for the 95% of GBM patients.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News