InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 3527
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/15/2016

Re: PlanTrader post# 39535

Wednesday, 06/30/2021 11:20:33 AM

Wednesday, June 30, 2021 11:20:33 AM

Post# of 43784
The part that is most intriguing to me is the part that sounded like the auxiliary group performed outstanding with clear efficacy.

Because the obvious purpose of that arm is to make sure nobody is cheating.

So by the sounds of things, if that's right, then we should be good to go, new doors to open with this tech, and maybe only a $7B/yr concern, but that's not too bad, for now.

Making a dent in this cancer thing is a big deal.

I have little reason to believe with what they've said that we can expect the over all test/control comparison to come up to what they've said about the sub-group.

Just remember though we can make it on secondary measures alone, and there is reason to believe that is going to be good.

The data, so far, also seems to suggest the theory is correct, put immunotherapy before Chemo ( if not eliminate chemo altogether )

Mustard Gas can't be good

Why not just use chlorine
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CVM News