Thursday, June 10, 2021 2:13:55 PM
Wrong, wrong, wrong.
"TA cant confirm a naked short position ...THAT MADE ME LOL!!!!"
The TAs job is to account for all the shares. If there were naked shorts then of course they wouldnt know who the shorter was BUT someone had to buy those shares. Those shares would show up in someones valid account and when a count is made there would be an overage in shares because there would be no negatives in any valid account to equalize the equation.
The CASE is NOT even about naked shorting. That was made up and has taken on a life of its own.
"TA cant confirm a naked short position ...THAT MADE ME LOL!!!!"
The TAs job is to account for all the shares. If there were naked shorts then of course they wouldnt know who the shorter was BUT someone had to buy those shares. Those shares would show up in someones valid account and when a count is made there would be an overage in shares because there would be no negatives in any valid account to equalize the equation.
The CASE is NOT even about naked shorting. That was made up and has taken on a life of its own.
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM

