I can see both scenarios happen. I can see the attempt to cut out shareholders, I can see him doing the right thing. Dont forget, to screw shareholders he has to not pay the shares of his family, Rob's family, probable investor related families, get sued and have his settlement under constant legal review and activity, and pay for legals. He would be hounded for years by holders here, with no assurance of success. There is something there for him to think about. Or if he does the real right thing-get the company trading again and run a communications company with the proceeds of the settlements. He doesnt owe us a dime then, and the money can be put to work in the industry. Shareholders can keep or sell their shares to those that think the company will have prospects going forward. There are acquisitions that could be made with that type of money, growing the company. Or outright sell the company, there are multiple options.
All information provided is the opinion of this poster from review of information in the public domain.