AI
Tuesday, May 25, 2021 11:06:02 AM
thank you for your attendance/service on behalf of us shareholders
we appreciate your attendance Long term & zombywolf
_______________________________
chanbond article ~ https://ipde.com/blog/2021/04/19/prior-expert-testimony-from-ipr-inadmissible-in-district-court-action/
Andrew E. Russell highlighted ~ It makes Cox look dishonest.
For invalidity purposes, Cisco/Cox wanted to read the prior art and the claims as broadly as possible; for infringement purposes, Cisco/Cox does not necessarily care about the prior art, but surely wants to read the claims narrowly. Those goals are not the same or similar motivation; they are different motivations.
I will grant Cox’s request under Rule 403 to exclude not only the testimony but any reference to the testimony. It has at most little probative value, which is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion, and waste of time
we appreciate your attendance Long term & zombywolf
_______________________________
chanbond article ~ https://ipde.com/blog/2021/04/19/prior-expert-testimony-from-ipr-inadmissible-in-district-court-action/
Andrew E. Russell highlighted ~ It makes Cox look dishonest.
For invalidity purposes, Cisco/Cox wanted to read the prior art and the claims as broadly as possible; for infringement purposes, Cisco/Cox does not necessarily care about the prior art, but surely wants to read the claims narrowly. Those goals are not the same or similar motivation; they are different motivations.
I will grant Cox’s request under Rule 403 to exclude not only the testimony but any reference to the testimony. It has at most little probative value, which is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion, and waste of time
Discover What Traders Are Watching
Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
