InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 89
Posts 14810
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/29/2002

Re: DragonBear post# 1832

Tuesday, 05/18/2021 12:48:32 PM

Tuesday, May 18, 2021 12:48:32 PM

Post# of 23069
You are quite cavalier to dismiss the findings of Dr. Peter McCullough and Prof. Havery Risch.

There is no need for controlled clinical trials when scientific observations and findings, repeatedly over thousands of cases support a hypothesis. i.e., in those reported early treatment cases, people reacted positively to the protocols, survived and did not need hospitalization. That is how many off label medications are multi-purposed, i.e. not used for its intended purpose.

Thought you would have known that, but since you are dealing with such superior intellects such as McCullough and Rish, sometimes one may overlook such basics.

Also Rish did not say that 60% of the Covid patients were vaccinated with Covid 19. What he did say, correctly, there was a high percentage of those who became infected w/Covid 19 had previously had "some" immunity from prior yearly flu vaccinations, and it could be up to 60% of the population over the last 70 years.

Oh, anyone discussing hydroxy/ivermectin would already know they are a part of a protocol. You are not up to snuff, hydroxy/ivermectin is the major component of the protocol.

You can find one of the many protocols, in this JAMA article:

https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext

"The rapidity and highly communicable nature of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has hampered the design and execution of definitive randomized, controlled trials of therapy outside of the clinic or hospital. In the absence of clinical trial results, physicians must use what has been learned about the pathophysiology of SARS"

As long as AMJM publishes Dr.McCullough, and his 600 other publications have been listed in a variety of other noted scientific journals, I prefer to follow his guidance than your opinion on IHUB.

---WUHAN LAB

If a lab tweaks a virus it may be gain of function, it also may function as bio-weapons experiment. Now don't tell me that you believe that the Chinese are credible and truthful???? How would you know anything about what China was creating since they have not allowed a credible investigation into the Wuhan Lab.

Now don't tell me you don't know that WHO appointed Peter Daszak, our bio-weapons promoter that routinely colluded with China. Great investigation!

"As it happens, a powerful American doctor (Daszak)lied. He claimed it was a conspiracy theory and now admits he knew it wasn’t. He did it to protect Chinese doctors from online criticism."


https://www.independentsentinel.com/influential-us-scientist-admits-he-lied-about-cov-leak-theory-to-silence/

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.