What seems weird to me about Du's ruling on rule 24/60 is what she did not address.
She went in great detail to explain why it's untimely and doesn't have standing. So she clearly spent plenty of time researching the subject.
What she failed to address is the crux of the entire filing: fraud on the court.
I understand her logic: because you don't have the right to file, I won't address the substance (fraud).
But I don't know how a reasonable person, who has done so much research, simply ignore such bombshell accusation. Marjac wasn't making some technical accusation, he said FRAUD.
Did Du go into a see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil mode?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
