| Followers | 55 |
| Posts | 17688 |
| Boards Moderated | 3 |
| Alias Born | 01/11/2004 |
Wednesday, March 31, 2021 11:18:43 AM
Elementary?
Those shares were traded and recorded.
Even if they were short, the outstanding share total has been bought back more than just a few times since those numbers were recorded. All those shares being referred to have LONG SINCE been bought back (if they were shorted shares to begin with!)
And by the way - those were RECORDED SHARES!
I thought the big mystery of the “naked share” theory was that there was NO RECORD of “naked shares” to show? That they were unrecorded and therefore invisible?
Sorry. Can’t have it both ways.
Those shares were traded and recorded.
Even if they were short, the outstanding share total has been bought back more than just a few times since those numbers were recorded. All those shares being referred to have LONG SINCE been bought back (if they were shorted shares to begin with!)
And by the way - those were RECORDED SHARES!
I thought the big mystery of the “naked share” theory was that there was NO RECORD of “naked shares” to show? That they were unrecorded and therefore invisible?
Sorry. Can’t have it both ways.
I keep telling myself....deep breath....count to ten....try to answer without personal attack...if available, always try to present fact to back up your opinion.
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
