I know this won't come as a surprise to you .. but I rec'd confirmation today re: a long's AON (all or nothing) bid/gtc (good till canceled) that once again NR (non retail) had to UC (undercut) the *ask* to fill .. this long had had 3 AONs placed @ bid .. 2 since 2.1.21 .. all for 30k size and set @ various price points in the mid 03c PPS range
Long had shared his first AON with me weeks ago .. first 2 AONs took just over 5 weeks to fill .. last one filled yesterday and like the other 2 *trades* .. was *filled* via an UC ask (this round @ 032c)
this was my comment yesterday @ 3:44PM in RT (real time) to another P2O investor who also observes PTOI's *trades*
So it looks like after the 258 and 10k they did 4 trades .. 39742 @ 032 (size showing per ATP was 35113) .. then 23513 @ 032 (size showing per ATP was 35513) .. then 22k @ UC ask (032c size 107671) .. then 107671 @ UC ask (032) size 107671 .. that relo/d ask back to 0399 (now 304013) and relo/d bid to 0292 (30k) .. I said earlier this week that this round seems to be focused on the 03/035 range
It may have been a legit bid @ 032 .. not showing (AON?) because when they UC like that it’s usually because they can’t fill the *bid*
now why I'm pointing this behavior out (not that it's new) .. is because of what NR keeps *showing*
back in 2019 when NR last *set up* PTOI for their orchestrated run (and resetting *volume* record of April 2011) .. the *set up* was done in about 6 weeks .. from Oct to Nov 15th (2019) .. the 90 day vol avg on 11.15.19 was @ 101k .. again it takes NR (even with their ever present bogus volume wash trades/resets) *time* to get that 90 day UP .. by contrast on 11.15.19 the 10 day vol avg was in the mid 400k range (10 day volume avg is far easier to manipulate)
late in 2020 .. kept seeing the same *pattern* on PTOI noted the year b4 .. indicating that someone (NR entity) was working PTOI .. again tracking volume and YOY avgs and how *trades* get marked (daily reg sho) .. and since there are no flies on NR .. on 2.17.21 .. NR *reset* PTOI's 52 week high to 059c (this matters because as i'd pointed out publicly .. PTOI's YOY %s would be showing *green* by mid to EO March 2021) .. reminder it took about 3 months~ for NRs' *record setting volume *overhang effort* of November 2019 to be worked thru other colluding entities (March 2020)
5 months on .. here's what PTOI *volume* avgs show .. note the comp re: the 90 day avg against 11.15.19's 101k avg
3.19.2021's data
Previous Close 03/18/2021 0.032 52-Week High 02/17/2021 0.059 52-Week Low 11/05/2020 0.0115 Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks) 03/18/2021 +6.67% Volume 52,872 Volume (10 day Average) 105,086 Volume (90 day Average) 134,946
and 11.15.19's data
Previous Close 11/14/2019 0.0749 52-Week High 11/15/2019 0.11 52-Week Low 11/16/2018 0.008 Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks) 11/14/2019 +610.63% Volume 1,423,292 Volume (10 day Average) 477,891 Volume (90 day Average) 101,688
Strongly suspect this NR/non retail entity is biding their time .. not sure what specifically this *effort* is being tied to .. this NR entity imo is both sloppy and obvious re: their *volume* efforts
I don't ever rule out a fed up/frustrated/exhausted retail P2O investor selling but for the most part .. it does appear based on 5 weeks to fill 30000 sized AONs (2 of the 3 took 5 weeks to fill/all filled via UC asks) .. that this NR entity most likely doesn't hold the *shares* they *show* on PTOI's ask
