>Those that score low go on to an education stressing occupational subjects. In other words, the brightest are given an education commensurate with their abilities instead of being left to boredom in a class below their intelligence level, and the least bright are given a thorough grounding in some sort of occupation ensuring that they can support themselves and contribute to society by holding a job requiring less intelligence, but perhaps more skill, and where they can achieve up to their abilities without being made to feel inferior.<
So at what age should we constrain a student's destiny?
Bear in mind that you're talking to a C+ student in university, so please type slowly