News Focus
News Focus
Followers 40
Posts 1805
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/26/2019

Re: Gbert post# 316343

Tuesday, 12/22/2020 10:21:56 AM

Tuesday, December 22, 2020 10:21:56 AM

Post# of 448124
Gbert,

Why not think that something as “benign” as VASCEPA with the positive data we have recently been provided couldn’t gain some serious traction? Who wouldn’t take it?


HCQ was in another time with far more fear and despair and no vaccine hope on the horizon...
Don't get me wrong, I too am full of hope for Vascepa. The thing is, it is quite one thing to hope and quite another to persuade others. Especially when it comes to the medical profession. Already the medical vultures like Nissen are circling, saying Vascepa causes atrial fibrillation and has no effect--can you imagine if Amrn makes claims of COVID_19 effect without categorical scientific proof. As it is with R-IT, the science was so very clear and convincing, but they chose to rake up the mineral oil diversion. This time we need to PREPARE-IT before we SERVE-IT to the masses. The question isn't so much "Who wouldn't take it?" but who will be persuaded and allowed to PRESCRIBE-IT...
HK
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News