InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 1013
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/07/2014

Re: Mason07 post# 27421

Thursday, 12/03/2020 11:13:35 AM

Thursday, December 03, 2020 11:13:35 AM

Post# of 29883
I was thinking the same thing.

Surely the State realizes a decline of Pebble is basically the beginning of denying mineral access to any claim in the area, as they’re all in or near the watershed headwaters.

Since the State attained (swapped) this land specifically for mineral development from the Federal Government, wouldn’t that amount to an unconstitutional “taking”? Alaska and any claim holders would deserve just compensation one would think.

Sure seems like this could be the “yarn starting to come out of the sweater”, and Alaska would want to have a voice in this.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NAK News