It shows that ERHC did have the shareholders' best interest in mind when they produced: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-19419-event-4.pdf Yes, all in the interest of it's SHAREHOLDERS. Shareholders = people who own shares in ERHC. Bam. As I recall, Julius asked some time ago: "Now WHY would ERHC defend itself via this document IF privatization via REVOCATION is the goal?" He was right.