I really do not want to argue much more about this. One can "draw the numbers as one wants". What people forget, however, this is an extremely invasive procedure, done only for cosmetic reasons, nothing is wrong functionally with eye glasses. When 5 MM procedures are made every year, statistics will catch up with you, and with time, even if only 1 in 10,000 procedures result with either immediate (quite rare) or long term (no one yet knows, but I fear these will come) problems, the inflated price could very rapidly come down. Remember Robin Pharmaceuticals? They went broke, it took close to 10 years of their system (in intrauterine cooper device to prevent conception) being in the field without any perceived problems before a rash (and less than 1 in 10,000) of problems appeared, they could not withstand the legal liabilities and went under. Why should I even take that risk when I already have two good "vision" plays that do not have these baggages or potential baggages and are priced much more reasonably (COO, surely, and QLTI on par with much greater potential)?