UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[Goodbuddy4863]

Thank You very much Long term:

" This infringement was known to Comcast or was so obvious that Comcast should have known about this infringement.
Despite knowing that its actions constituted infringement of the Patents and/or despite knowing
that that there was a high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of the Patents,
Comcast nevertheless continued its infringing actions, and continued to make, use and sell
infringing DOCSIS 3.0 (and higher) products.
33. Comcast’s infringement of the ’822, ’679 and ’565 Patents has thus been
deliberate and willful, at least since February 23, 2012.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff ChanBond, LLC respectfully requests that this Court enter
judgment in its favor as follows:
A. Declaring that defendants have infringed, literally and/or under the doctrine of
equivalents, at least one claim of each of the ’822, ’679 and ’565 Patents, and that this
infringement is willful;
B. Awarding to Plaintiff the damages to which it is entitled under 35 U.S.C. § 284
for defendants’ past infringement and any continuing or future infringement, including
compensatory damages, and the trebling of such damages due to the willful nature of the
infringement;
C. Awarding Plaintiff costs (including all disbursements) and expenses incurred in
this action;
D. Awarding Plaintiff pre- and post-judgment interest on its damages;
E. Declaring that this case is exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §285 and awarding
Plaintiff its attorneys’ fees and costs; and
11
F. Awarding Plaintiff such other and further relief in law or in equity as this Court
deems just and proper.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff, under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, requests a trial by jury of
any and all issues so triable by right.
Dated: September 21, 2015
OF COUNSEL:
Mark Raskin
Robert Whitman
John F. Petrsoric
MISHCON DE REYA NEW YORK LLP
750 Seventh Ave., 26th Floor
New York, NY 10019
BAYARD, P.A."