News Focus
News Focus
Followers 75
Posts 113811
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 08/01/2006

Re: blackhawks post# 341538

Saturday, 03/14/2020 12:15:16 AM

Saturday, March 14, 2020 12:15:16 AM

Post# of 575224
One model apportions cost: 80% to panic response. 20% to the virus itself. Just saw an interview with the guy. Missed who he was.

Though many may reflexively read that as a position against the panic response they would be wrong.
It is simply an objective look at the cost related to the f*king latest new and not yet understood virus.

In relation to that see

i understand and agree .. Why Overreacting to the Threat of the Coronavirus May Be Rational
https://time.com/5801010/coronavirus-overreaction/
.. first posted on Just Politics ..
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154335016

add most important flattening the curve

How canceled events and self-quarantines save lives, in one chart
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154335881

See also:

GDP damage it should be noted is not caused by the virus. That damage arises from prevention
methods, such as travel restrictions, event cancellations and interruption to supply chains, used.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154206332



It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today