InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,564.41
(
1.08%
)
US TECH 100
19,289.20
(
-0.08%
)
Dow Jones
40,415.44
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
81.22
(
-0.37%
)
Bitcoin
66,565.21
(
-1.54%
)
Post# of 222429
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

OMOLIVES

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 118
Posts 10125
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/21/2016

OMOLIVES

Re: janice shell post# 167173

Monday, 02/17/2020 10:32:42 PM

Monday, February 17, 2020 10:32:42 PM

Post# of 222429
Janice, The patent assignment was executed on Jan 1, 2016(prior to the 10-k). That is the focal point. My assumption is that when they acquired the assets in 2013(refer to other assignments here(2013).... https://assignment.uspto.gov/patent/index.html#/patent/search/resultAssignor?assignorName=LAWFUL%20INTERCEPT,%20LLC

...they assumed that they could sell/license the acquired patents.

ooopps...after further study and attempts...they realized that they may have made a poor decision. Now they burn cash in an attempt to secure such..form thereof.

again...ooops :)
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up