News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 14843
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/25/2005

Re: Stock H.O.G. post# 206137

Wednesday, 12/06/2006 1:30:30 PM

Wednesday, December 06, 2006 1:30:30 PM

Post# of 311080
There would seem to be two logical explanations for why they paid $500K for SAM:

1) Because the $6MM revenue number in the PR is a "hopeful/future" estimate, and PV forgot to word it as such.

Or..

2) SAM has decent revenue ($6MM or whatever) but are in poor financial shape: lots and lots of debt, operating at a loss, or whatever.

All Posts Are Just My Opinion

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y