News Focus
News Focus
Followers 327
Posts 92770
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 07/06/2002

Re: None

Tuesday, 12/05/2006 2:33:47 PM

Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:33:47 PM

Post# of 77489
*** From last evening's LeMetropole Cafe ***

GATA's Bill Murphy speaking:

"There is an article included below titled, "Goldman's top alumni wield White House clout," which I have included in full because of my focus on Goldman Sachs the past 8 years. However, the story fails to get into the real story about Goldman Sachs and the US government, which is about how this incestuous relationship brings easy access to what the Working Group on Financial Markets, Exchange Stabilization Fund, Counterparty Risk Management Group, and Gold Cartel have in mind for US financial markets.

Inside information of what the US markets are going to do before they do it, is INVALUABLE to say the least. It is clear the US financial markets are HEAVILY managed. How would you like to be in on some of that managing? Think you could make a buck?

The last two quarterly profits reported by Goldman Sachs BLEW AWAY the analysts' of the estimates they were so good. Of course, it is too much to ask one of the Planet Wall Street journalists to put 2 and 2 together, and do some serious inquiry that maybe this overly close relationship might have something to do with those astounding financial results. Instead, a point made in the article is how the Goldman Sachs people are just wonderful public servants. Yeah right, ones made VERY rich by this service in which they are privy to inside market information ahead of everyone else. The farce goes on and on and so does the Planet Wall Street reporting on it. Oops, even that would be too much for the controlled US financial market writers. This came from London …


Goldman's top alumni wield White House clout

By Stephanie Kirchgaessner and Ben White
Financial Times, London
Sunday, December 3, 2006

America's corporate elite has long upheld a tradition of joining Washington's corridors of power for a new career. JPMorgan executives gave counsel to President Woodrow Wilson during the first world war. President John F. Kennedy asked Robert McNamara, a war veteran who had risen to the top ranks of Ford, to become secretary of defence in 1960.

But the appointment last week of Goldman Sachs' William Dudley to head the Federal Reserve Bank of New York markets group raised to an unprecedented level the number of top positions in public service that former executives from any one company have held during a White House administration.

Today, former Goldman Sachs executives control or influence the oversight of key aspects of the US financial system and hold prominent positions throughout the Bush White House.

They include: Hank Paulson, the Treasury secretary and former Goldman chief executive; Reuben Jeffrey, a former Goldman managing partner who is the chief regulator of commodity futures and options trading; Joshua Bolten, White House chief of staff who served as a Goldman executive director; Robert Steel, the former Goldman vice-chairman who advises Mr Paulson on domestic finance; and Rand Fort, the ex-Goldman director of global security who advises Condeleezza Rice, the secretary of state.

The composition of President George W. Bush's working group on financial markets demonstrates the clout of the company's former executives on policy.

The panel -- which is composed of Mr Paulson, Mr Jeffrey, Ben Bernanke, the Rederal Reserve chairman, and Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission -- would be Mr Bush's first port of call in the event of a financial crisis.

Mr Dudley would also play a crucial role in stabilising the markets in the event of a meltdown, as one of his predecessors, Peter Fisher, did following the near collapse of Long-Term Capital Management, the hedge fund. The former executives will also be influential in issues ranging from the regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the housing giants, to tax policy, to how heavily the energy markets should be regulated; all issues that Goldman Sachs lobbies heavily on in Washington.

"I don't think anybody else even comes close" to holding the number of top positions in Washington, says Charles Geisst, a Wall Street historian and professor at Manhattan College, who points out that Goldman's reach is even more impressive because it comes at a time when there is no single dominant bank or brokerage in the US.

Unlike other companies that are targeted for being too cozy with the White House, neither Mr Bush nor Goldman have been criticised by Democrats for holding too many powerful jobs, in part because the investment bank also has deep ties to Democrats.

Goldman represented the biggest single donor base to the Democratic party ahead of this year's mid-term elections, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, and at least two Democratic political heavyweights Jon Corzine, the New Jersey governor, and Robert Rubin, the former Treasury secretary, are Goldman alumni.

Goldman says it is proud of its long record of public service, but does the company yield too much power in Washington?

Alex Knott, political editor at the Center for Public Integiry, says that while there is no doubt that former Goldman executives have the experience to hold their posts, they also have close ties to a company that benefits from their public policy decisions.

"It does create a potential conflict of interest because so much regulation is doled out by administrators who could be looking out for their former employees and co-workers," he says.

Whatever potential conflict of interest may exist, however, neither Mr Knott nor executives at competing banks have substantive complaints about the influx of former Goldman leaders.

"I'd love to point out a smoking gun in their direction but I can't," said one senior executive at a rival bank. "They've created this tradition of public service and it does accrue benefit to the Goldman brand. That's not a conflict. It's just what it is. It's something people are envious of."

Orin Kramer, chairman of the New Jersey State Investment Council and a close friend of Mr Corzine, says life can sometimes be made more difficult for Goldman because of its ties to public life. Mr Paulson, for example, has vowed to recuse himself from any matter that pertains specifically to Goldman over his tenure. Last month he removed himself from the national security review of Lucent's merger with Alcatel, which was being advised by Goldman.

http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto120320061956506824&page=1

Dan

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now