| Followers | 0 |
| Posts | 1456 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 06/05/2018 |
Friday, December 20, 2019 8:49:02 PM
Your judge ruled incorrectly.
Shame on her for trying to make a statement rather then considering precedence.
Its embarrassing.
The review is expected, right and correct.
DBMM has no right to be treated any different then all other delinquent tickers in the past who were revoked.
I question the judges motives.
I'm sure she's just a bit anxious right now.
Shame on her for trying to make a statement rather then considering precedence.
Its embarrassing.
The review is expected, right and correct.
DBMM has no right to be treated any different then all other delinquent tickers in the past who were revoked.
I question the judges motives.
I'm sure she's just a bit anxious right now.
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
