Friday, October 18, 2019 12:28:31 PM
Ken also said that $5M note in MDCN was 'paid for' by a note in kind, so that MDCN 'owned' a $5M note in GSFI.
My opinion is that 'note swap' is invalid, based on a) the definition of such a note, which is supposed to be a note for "funds" or "money" that the company can used for growth, and b) the logic behind it, which proves absurd if you simply extend the 'value' of each note to $5B or $5T dollars. Since the notes are of the exact same kind, it's obvious that neither note creates $5M in wealth any more than $5B or $5T in wealth, if those arbitrary numbers were assigned to them.
My opinion is that 'note swap' is invalid, based on a) the definition of such a note, which is supposed to be a note for "funds" or "money" that the company can used for growth, and b) the logic behind it, which proves absurd if you simply extend the 'value' of each note to $5B or $5T dollars. Since the notes are of the exact same kind, it's obvious that neither note creates $5M in wealth any more than $5B or $5T in wealth, if those arbitrary numbers were assigned to them.
Recent GSFI News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/09/2026 08:56:37 PM
- Form SC 14F1 - Statement regarding change in majority of directors [Rule 14f-1] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/08/2026 08:02:57 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/08/2026 05:18:41 PM
- Green Stream Holdings, Inc. Announces New Leadership and Board Appointments and Strategic Direction Involving Law90 and Subsidiaries • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/27/2026 11:00:00 AM
