Monday, September 09, 2019 5:24:05 PM
Thanks for your response. I remembered the BB collaboration comment and remembered that it was vague on the details of the collaboration. I also remembered seeing different posters saying different things (i.e., LQMT and Eontec developing/owning 106c, or LQMT and Yihao developing/owning 106c, etc.), and given the uncertainty expressed by joshuaeyu (post# 179242), I thought I'd ask.
I'm not surprised by "information overload". Separating the wheat from the chaff and keeping it straight in your mind is difficult. As is trying to remember where the facts/nuggets ended and the logical(?)/fanciful(?) leaps of faith from the nuggets commenced.
I'm not surprised by "information overload". Separating the wheat from the chaff and keeping it straight in your mind is difficult. As is trying to remember where the facts/nuggets ended and the logical(?)/fanciful(?) leaps of faith from the nuggets commenced.
Apple-LQMT MTA = perpetual and exclusive license in CE to Apple
Eontec-LQMT Parallel License Agreement - (1) No CE; (2) No royalties defined; (3) no enforcement mechanism for territorial exclusivity violations
Recent LQMT News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/08/2026 08:37:19 PM
- Liquidmetal Technologies Inc. to Present at the LD Micro Main Event XIX • Newsfile • 10/06/2025 11:30:00 AM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/13/2025 08:00:57 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/10/2025 08:02:21 PM
