Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,230.12
(
0.29%
)
US TECH 100
26,942.00
(
0.87%
)
Dow Jones
49,499.27
(
-0.31%
)
Brent Oil
107.80
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
78,723.02
(
0.05%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 239441
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

PatentGuy1

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 9
Posts 2333
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/14/2016

PatentGuy1

Re: jaybiscuit post# 179393

Monday, 09/09/2019 1:21:56 PM

Monday, September 09, 2019 1:21:56 PM

Post# of 239441
Thank you for your response.

I'm genuinely curious as to why some parts of the PLA are not applicable (i.e., no CE) but other parts are applicable (i.e., territorial exclusivity). Do you have a theory on that or is it more of a hope/gut feeling?

Apple-LQMT MTA = perpetual and exclusive license in CE to Apple
Eontec-LQMT Parallel License Agreement - (1) No CE; (2) No royalties defined; (3) no enforcement mechanism for territorial exclusivity violations

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent LQMT News
More LQMT News