World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[risk_it_us]

This is intersting, I just checked the dockets for globetel on the litigation and the judge denied the unopposed motion to extend the time for globetel to answer the complaint for the following reasons:

From the docket: "ORDER denying 33 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The Motion is denied, without prejudice, for the following reason: Pursuant to the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures, proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, jury instructions, and proposed orders shall be filed initially as an attachment to a motion, notice, or other filing; however, the final version of the proposed document must be e-mailed to Judge Altonaga at [e-mail]. The final version of the proposed document shall be submitted by e-mail in WordPerfect or Word format. The e-mail line and the name of the attachment should include the case number, followed by a short description of the attachment (e.g., 06-cv-21071 Order). The CM/ECF Administrative Procedures may be viewed at http://www.flsd.uscourts.gov. (CMA) (Entered: 11/21/2006)"

I'm sure they've already amended and refiled the unopposed motion however this motion was filed by gtem's attorneys in error, interesting.

I'll post the document relative to the denial on my group tomorrow.