Saturday, July 06, 2019 11:08:05 AM
I completely disagree.
Obviously not about American Requirements. But those come with mineral discovery. Which would first need to be reported to Canada. Via the 43-101.
Funny thing about Canada is you may own the ground but they own all the minerals in that ground.
Where do you think I’m finding these Offical reports? I have legal access to the databases.
I’m not exaggerating when I say a mineral rush in not only our area but Ontario as a whole.
And again. Our area is in Prime mineral deposits.
Even our own drill hole connect the dots. That’s why we permitted for a lot more holes
And let’s not forget again the serious advances in Seismic Imaging.
Now onsite as we speak.
Obviously not about American Requirements. But those come with mineral discovery. Which would first need to be reported to Canada. Via the 43-101.
Funny thing about Canada is you may own the ground but they own all the minerals in that ground.
Where do you think I’m finding these Offical reports? I have legal access to the databases.
I’m not exaggerating when I say a mineral rush in not only our area but Ontario as a whole.
And again. Our area is in Prime mineral deposits.
Even our own drill hole connect the dots. That’s why we permitted for a lot more holes
And let’s not forget again the serious advances in Seismic Imaging.
Now onsite as we speak.
Sometimes its Skil, Sometimes its Luc.
Appreciate Member Marks
ALL IMHO
Recent ACRL News
- Atacama Resources International, Inc. Reports Results of Initial Geophysical Program at Lamothe Property in Quebec's James Bay Region • Newsfile • 03/10/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Atacama Resources International, Inc. Acquires 100% Interest in Atacama 3 Property Near Macassa Mine; Announces 2026 Exploration Plans • Newsfile • 02/26/2026 01:32:00 PM
