Today’s pitch is a Hoyt Wilhelm special, knuckleball … for those who have problems following the logic:
TGD has emphasized that Anavex wants to determine whether 2-73 works or not: quick failure preferred vs. lingering doubt about efficacy. As such, why would he allow the Aussies to begin a Rett 2-73 trial if he weren’t confident/didn’t know that the FIRST trial, US-based, provided positive results? [FYI – The first Aussie Rett participant has completed her 7-weeks of treatment … now the wait for the extension period decision to kick in.]
To put forth an additional thought: IMO, it would be unethical and almost criminal of Anavex and TGD to push the Aussie Rett trial if it were known that 2-73 did NOT help these suffering women ... and I don't believe TGD is unethical!
ANAVEX NOW … MONO-STYLE … RWEm for Life!!!
P.S. If these thoughts were presented before, my apologies.
P.P.S. At the age of 8, I saw Hoyt no-hit the Yankees on September 20, 1958 and Gus Triandos tied Yogi Berra for the most HR’s by an AL catcher with his 30th in a 1-0 game at old Memorial Stadium in Baltimore.
Market Data 
Markets 
