Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

Tearex, Why should anyone waste time on explaining something to you which has been settled and covered here too many times.

"Papadopoulos or the Clinton Dossier??"

See

ForReal, Back then Steele was working with the FBI.

"So, the DNC has a foreign operative (Steele) provide dirt on Trump, from Russian sources, in a dossier, that could not be verified
and the FBI just ignored that, to investigate the Trump campaign, on the basis of comments made in a bar? What's wrong with that picture?"

The Russia probe: A timeline from Moscow to Mueller

[...]

EARLY 2013: Carter Page, who years later would become an unpaid adviser to Trump’s campaign, shares information and research with a Russian national whom the FBI later accuses of being a Kremlin spy. According to the FBI, the spy is secretly recorded in April 2013 talking with another accused spy about efforts to “recruit” Page “as an intelligence source.” (Page cooperated with the investigation. He has since said his communications were innocent and has denied relaying any sensitive or private information to the accused spy.)

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=148614235

Particularly when all you will do is spin whatever is given to you, and carry the spinning for hours.

"If you're trying to say it was the Bar room banter in London with the Clinton Foundation confidant, then please explain the FBI asset Halper planting the info with Papa previous to the bar room tip off. Then explain the FBI spy/investigator sent to try to seduce Papa prior to the bar room tip off. The FBI was involved prior to the Bar room conversation with the Clinton's Australian "money man"(he is clearly conflicted)."

See again (should be) for you if you read as you could

Giuliani to Cuomo: Mueller agreed to limit Trump interview

[...]

F.B.I. Used Informant to Investigate Russia Ties to Campaign, Not to Spy, as Trump Claims

.. image ..

By Adam Goldman, Mark Mazzetti and Matthew Rosenberg
May 18, 2018

WASHINGTON — President Trump accused the F.B.I. on Friday, without evidence, of sending a spy to secretly infiltrate his 2016 campaign “for political purposes” even before the bureau had any inkling of the “phony Russia hoax.”

In fact, F.B.I. agents sent an informant to talk to two campaign advisers only after they received evidence that the pair had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the campaign. The informant, an American academic who teaches in Britain, made contact late that summer with one campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, according to people familiar with the matter. He also met repeatedly in the ensuing months with the other aide, Carter Page, who was also under F.B.I. scrutiny for his ties to Russia.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/us/politics/trump-fbi-informant-russia-investigation.html

Why do you think i asked you the question? Put it down to inane false hopes on my part. It wasn't expectation on my part, just a forlorn .. maybe maybe...

Of course you performed as expected. Like a circus clown.

Tearex, The question now is, will you accept the FBI Russian investigation started in 2013?