Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[gastric]

Anyone care to counter Judge Koh's ruling with facts from the patents? Many board posters here claim to be patent experts, VoiP experts, consult with patent experts and attorneys, so they must have reams of specific data they can copy-paste directly from the patents to refute Judge Koh.

"...Moreover, the claim does not provide for any specific implementation of the abstract idea. The claim does not specify, for instance, the content of the caller and callee identifiers, the technology that matches information in the caller dialing profile with information in the callee identifier, what network classification criteria are used to classify the call as a public network or a private network call, or how the classification is implemented...."