Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[gastric]

If the patents are NOT abstract then someone should be able to easily and quickly cite some specific evidence from the patents that refute this claim. Yet not a single person has to date.

"...Moreover, the claim does not provide for any specific implementation of the abstract idea. The claim does not specify, for instance, the content of the caller and callee identifiers, the technology that matches information in the caller dialing profile with information in the callee identifier, what network classification criteria are used to classify the call as a public network or a private network call, or how the classification is implemented...."

Judge Koh did an excellent job writing in a fairly easy to understand language and provided clear references to precedent and other patent cases. You can read it here: https://www.scribd.com/document/403267736/VOIP-PAL-Obviousness-Ruling