Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,400.96
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
28,486.00
(
0.69%
)
Dow Jones
49,760.56
(
0.11%
)
Brent Oil
105.91
(
0.14%
)
Bitcoin
80,817.01
(
0.41%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 153977
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Longstrongsilver

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 36
Posts 5245
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/24/2018

Longstrongsilver

Member Level

Re: 1manband post# 66519

Wednesday, 03/27/2019 5:55:14 PM

Wednesday, March 27, 2019 5:55:14 PM

Post# of 153977
You are somewhat correct. It is never factually incorrect. However, opposing interpretations of THE LAWS often are . In fact almost 100% of the time, one party’s is (sometimes both or at least the interpretation of the judge etc). This isn’t even debatable. It’s why lawyers /clients go against each other each with their own interpretation of a Law/situation. Then a judge applies his /hers interpretations
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today