Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,519.12
(
0.61%
)
US TECH 100
29,229.20
(
1.84%
)
Dow Jones
50,461.68
(
-0.23%
)
Brent Oil
95.74
(
-1.29%
)
Bitcoin
75,755.22
(
-0.12%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 169298
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

TEX

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 44
Posts 12731
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/15/2005

TEX

Re: 53chevy post# 130201

Tuesday, 11/14/2006 1:39:21 AM

Tuesday, November 14, 2006 1:39:21 AM

Post# of 169298
not following you here:

are you saying that "UCC funds" can't be questioned later?

As i understand it? SEC can *not* suspend twice (subsequently, however that's stated) for the *same* concerns.

Also, not catching your minimum "$300M plus" valuation...

ie, "whatever portion" ...

"declared bonds"

[what might be] "proven to be associated"


make sense?

Adventures in microcapitalism

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=11942

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today