InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,470.48
(
0.60%
)
Post# of 96904
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

sqrl

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 496
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/30/2017

sqrl

Re: khenry458 post# 61547

Monday, 02/04/2019 12:37:01 PM

Monday, February 04, 2019 12:37:01 PM

Post# of 96904
I've always been amazed how the PTO examiners cite "obviousness" to invalidate as to combinations of inventions and how one "skilled in the art" would have known to come up with invention at that time. WHY DIDN"T THEY????????
Chanbond did, hence the patent.

Anyone know the timeframe for Chanbond to reply?????
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up