Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,132.01
(
-0.10%
)
US TECH 100
26,419.20
(
0.45%
)
Dow Jones
48,816.81
(
-0.66%
)
Brent Oil
109.94
(
5.29%
)
Bitcoin
75,999.29
(
-0.45%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 96939
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

sqrl

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 503
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/30/2017

sqrl

Re: khenry458 post# 61547

Monday, 02/04/2019 12:37:01 PM

Monday, February 04, 2019 12:37:01 PM

Post# of 96939
I've always been amazed how the PTO examiners cite "obviousness" to invalidate as to combinations of inventions and how one "skilled in the art" would have known to come up with invention at that time. WHY DIDN"T THEY????????
Chanbond did, hence the patent.

Anyone know the timeframe for Chanbond to reply?????
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today