Hannover House Inc (HHSE)

[downthehatch]

Here's the way the "professionals" at HHSE report in their quarterly filing on a judgment entered against the company in the Uptone case:

1). UPTONE PICTURES – The producers of “Union Bound” filed a lawsuit against company in Los Angeles Federal Court, which has since been settled by mutual agreement. However, despite settlement being made – and payment tendered via Cashier’s Check – Company was informed on March 30, 2018 that Uptone Pictures had filed a new cause of action in this matter. As of June 18, 2018, counsel for HHSE has confirmed that this secondary action is being dismissed, based upon HHSE’s satisfaction of the prior settlement terms. During Q3, HHSE was informed that the secondary action was not dismissed and that Uptone was seeking to file a motion for judgment. HHSE counsel has stated that a motion to dismiss the filing for judgment will be filed in a timely manner.

What does all this ridiculous gibberish about "counsel for HHSE has confirmed this secondary action is being dismissed" even mean?... when the next sentence says "HHSE was informed that the secondary action was not dismissed."

Could they maybe include a fact or two in these reports??

Anyone think this would be an acceptable description of a judgment in a Form 10??

HAHAHAHA... comedy gold!