InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,469.30
(
0.39%
)
US TECH 100
19,175.20
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
39,112.16
(
-0.76%
)
Brent Oil
84.61
(
0.50%
)
Bitcoin
61,565.51
(
-0.40%
)
Post# of 96905
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (6) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (6) Next 10 Prev Next

khenry458

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 14
Posts 537
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/14/2010

khenry458

Re: Gm1850 post# 59351

Sunday, 12/09/2018 9:17:48 AM

Sunday, December 09, 2018 9:17:48 AM

Post# of 96905
It looks like the last paragraph applies to us and the rest is using Weyerhauser case to argue why Arris feels the court has jurisdiction to hear this case.
We argued that the case be dropped in document 27(III. CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, ChanBond asks the Court to dismiss these appeals for lack of jurisdiction.).
That was my understanding of this letter. We'll have to wait on the reply to see how this argument from Arris(doc 34) holds up.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (6) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (6) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up