News Focus
News Focus

OFP

Followers 8
Posts 1392
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/13/2011

OFP

Re: Amatuer17 post# 170004

Saturday, 10/27/2018 1:05:02 PM

Saturday, October 27, 2018 1:05:02 PM

Post# of 517556

Can company do a simple test in few healthy patients to see the concentration level for DZP and DZP naive patients. That will settle the matter.

If by concentration you mean blood concentration I would not expect it to be dramatically* affected by the binding affinity differences. However your primary point remains. If 2-73 and DZP bind to the same site (and all signs point to a single orthosteric site for both) then they will compete for access and DZP will win when they go head to head (as per the nature of dramatically different binding affinities). With the caveat that DZP may not occupy 100% of receptors at therapeutic doses so limited access might be possible. The result is that 2-73 has limited or no access to the S1R when DZP is present. This should be a very elementary question for AVXL and is one they should have answered long ago...There are two possibilities:
1. AVXL is so incompetent that they didn't already answer this incredibly basic and central question.
2. They have the answer but they are not sharing it (in which case the results are undoubtedly bad).

I think it's #2. Someone needs to ask if they have this data in a public setting when Missling can't do some BS dodge of the question.


*I guess it's theoretically possible to alter the free vs. protein bound levels and therefore potentially affect metabolism rates. Expect this is somewhere between a non-effect and a trivial one though.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AVXL News