News Focus
News Focus
Followers 111
Posts 26258
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/30/2004

Re: mr40 post# 23397

Tuesday, 09/18/2018 7:19:04 PM

Tuesday, September 18, 2018 7:19:04 PM

Post# of 244697
These physicists FOS, IMO.

The article starts off with The Rosie O'Donnell Theorem.

[/It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. quote]

It bears stating that never before have fully loaded airliners travelling at 550 knot, with transcontinental loads of fuel hit 110 story buildings.

[Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition/quote]

Indeed, neither before nor since 9/11 have fires caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise—nor has any other natural event,



More FOS. IMO.

A poor design, thermal expansion and 19`Muslim Maniacs brought down the WTC Towers.

There was only minor structural framing in the interiors of thee Towers. That was around the elevator shafts. The main structural support was 14" steel columns, on 20' centers around the perimeter. The Towers had 208' sides. A disastrous design.

I'm not going to calculate how much 208' of 14" steel beams would expand at +- 1200 d, but it's a bunch. The columns and beams are connected by steel bolts. They pass trough slotted holes. A a point, as the beam expanded the bolts sheared. 30 floors of the Towers headed South, taking the other 80 floors with them.

To Be Continued.



Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today