Saturday, September 15, 2018 10:35:31 AM
How come its assumed that those shares noted on page 15 are assumed to be doled out 6 months after the issue date. Why wouldn't that 6 months be called out in the terms? Im not an expert on these filings. How does the maturity date play out in these dates? Is the maturity date an option the note holder can be paid out in as opposed to be given shares? But back to the basics, where is it stated that the note holders got their shares at 6 months after the issue date? It does look like they did as the accum/dist has dropped big in that timeframe beginning in July.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=12769884&guid=TE-ZU6WMikMxKth
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=12769884&guid=TE-ZU6WMikMxKth
Recent PHIL News
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/30/2025 04:02:02 PM
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/13/2025 08:15:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/11/2025 07:00:34 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/11/2025 06:49:07 PM
