A new management took over. At least we should wait how this will be managed and what´s planned before we predict toxic debt for example.
What has this to do with factual data? He was not responsible for the toxic debt in PNTV, he was only a director since 1-2 years! All i see is negative speculation before Brett did anything wrong! No facts!
He did not even pump the stock after name change. In fact otcmarkets forced him to release a pr to remove ce. How does this fit to a pump and dump?
Why was there no dumping last 2 months when stock had good bids at .60+ if the plan is to dilute into the ground? Why the 1 for 100 reverse split in a stock with 74m o/s and 30m float. This doesn´t fit together!