News Focus
News Focus
Followers 182
Posts 5591
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/08/2017

Re: magikalalpha post# 107627

Wednesday, 02/28/2018 2:18:16 PM

Wednesday, February 28, 2018 2:18:16 PM

Post# of 347110
Not entirely true. It for example can be proven without an audit that the authorized share count was reduced... It can be proven without an audit what the common share count is...

So with those 2 numbers we need no audit for, it is proof enough to me and many on here that the other numbers are good to go... How do I know without an audit?

Well... What benefit does Roger receive if his numbers are wrong or lies and he is having them audited? None... That'd only hurt AMFE... AT BEST Roger could hype AMFE and dilute the stock selling shares on the hype for an increased share price... But there is obviously no dilution and that can be confirmed without an audit. Likewise, the nature the authorized share count was reduced from 900 million to 600 million tells me Roger has no intentions of massively diluting AMFE...

so without dilution, what else would Roger stand to benefit from lying??? A temporary rise in share price that'll fall once the lies are exposed??? For what purpose if he isn't diluting??? To say he did??? That doesn't make much sense...

The numbers will be fine, the audit will reflect that... Either that or Roger is just one gigantic idiot pumping the stock for no reason at all, nor taking part in benefiting from pumping a stock on lies...

I think this is a little beyond just anyone's opinion... And even if you want to remain skeptical... Fine... But if you were a betting person, where would you place your bet knowing what you know here... So even with the best we can know... If you're invested here, then you probably believe the audit will come back good!!! Otherwise why would you be here??? That wouldn't make sense... Unless you hate money...


Guess who's back. Tell a friend!

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y