Saturday, November 25, 2017 3:05:27 PM
For now, I would assign LV to be 0.16 base on Li purchase price. I welcome others to submit their own subjective LV.
Couple of thoughts here:
1) The value of the IP, in my opinion, will increase over 5 years and not decrease. Of course this is subjective. But I believe the IP will be enhanced by ammendments which may be applied to extend the life of the IP.
Also, I believe that new IP will be added.
2) Limiting the IP Value only LQMT's IP is inherently a mistake, as well.
In fact, the cross-licensing agreement gives LQMT access to Li's IP, both existing and future. Therefore, by restricting the LV to only LQMT's IP and not also, the perpetual access to Eontec IP does not reflect the true value of ALL IP.
While not able to justify any quantification of this due to my lack of sophistication in financial calculations, I would intuitively put the LV significantly higher than .16 pps. Perhaps, indeed, at least .25 PPS.
Dollar-wise, I believe we will, in the future make more revenues off of Eontecs IP than our own.
Just my thoughts.
Welcome any discussion on this, pro or con, by parties much better at Financial Valuation than I. Thanks.
Recent LQMT News
- Liquidmetal Technologies Inc. to Present at the LD Micro Main Event XIX • Newsfile • 10/06/2025 11:30:00 AM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/13/2025 08:00:57 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/10/2025 08:02:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/29/2025 08:02:37 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/13/2025 08:06:09 PM
