My understanding is that lenders in the OTC land do gamble. They are in it for a short investment and gain. If they see an opportunity to get a bigger gain, they go for it.
I think given Steve's comments and what I gleaned from the 10Q about due dates, they must have gambled that Steve would default since their cash reserves were nearly depleted and that QMC hasn't announced additional funding agreements. Unfortunately, it looks as though their gamble was a bust as QMC paid them on time.
They may stand to gain something if they keep the share price suppressed and QMC defaults on the last payment.
You can find the terms of their agreement on the SEC website. I just took a brief look. I'm not a lawyer, but it appears that SBI and L2 can not short sell the stock during the "Commitment Period." Maybe QMC suspects they were shorting the stock and took them to court to stop it as a violation of the agreement? I don't know what the reason, but apparently per Steve, he believes one of their lenders is doing something proprietorial.
There may be other provisions in the agreement that may indicate a violation of the contract which would give QMC leverage to file and injunction, etc., or claim the investor was doing something illegal.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.