News Focus
News Focus
Followers 37
Posts 3267
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/27/2016

Re: B60611 post# 123919

Tuesday, 10/10/2017 8:34:55 PM

Tuesday, October 10, 2017 8:34:55 PM

Post# of 517758
For all of our sakes, I hope your right.

We didn't have enough votes. That means shareholders either didn't know what to do because they were confused or didn't trust the management enough to give them that power. Either way, not voting means no confindence.

It doesn't matter what the CEO thinks. A large percentage of the shareholders disagreed with what happened. It was hostile. Evidently not enough.

What makes you so confident that it wouldn't happen?

Let's see. Potentially a world changing breakthrough worth hundreds of billions of dollars that threatens the profits of big pharma. Hmmm. What would you do if a company could take billions of profits away from you? And you know you could take-over that company for a fraction of what you could potentially lose.

And oh yeah. You could reap the benefits of having that company for decades to come.

The potential to make hundreds of billions or lose billions because you didn't want to drop some pocket change to take-over a company.

You may need to rethink your guarantee. The choice seems pretty clear.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AVXL News