News Focus
News Focus
Followers 843
Posts 122817
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: DewDiligence post# 15362

Tuesday, 10/10/2017 8:09:08 PM

Tuesday, October 10, 2017 8:09:08 PM

Post# of 30495
WSJ on PG’s (inconsequential) proxy vote:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/p-g-shares-look-expensive-with-or-without-nelson-peltz-1507657302

...the result won’t change much. Mr. Peltz’s plan for the company isn’t substantially different from management’s; it mainly involved pushing harder on doors management had already opened, such as improving digital marketing and speeding up decision-making.

…An interesting precedent may be Mr. Peltz’s failure to win a seat on the board of DuPont in 2015. The chemical giant’s management rebuffed the activist’s calls for a breakup, only to propose a far more complex split following a merger with rival Dow Chemical. Mr. Peltz lost the proxy battle but in a sense won the war.

…Whether the efforts of either Mr. Taylor or Mr. Peltz succeed in boosting the share price is another matter. P&G stock has lagged behind peers, but still trades for 21 times forward earnings…

No position.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today